Why
do I like Batman?
Well, I can’t help but compare him to other comic book
heroes. Unlike Superman, Spiderman, and the X-Men, he isn’t an alien or a
mutant. He doesn’t have any remarkable superpowers that allow him to fly or
punch his fist through walls or lift ridiculously heavy objects. What makes him
unique?
His family. His heritage is that of being a wealthy entrepeuner whose father was a famous surgeon. I can’t entirely be sure if his father, Thomas Wayne, had earned his fortune or had inherited it. What I do know is that, being a doctor, he was associated with a Dr. Leslie Thompkins and that his butler, Alfred Pennyworth, had been a medic in WWII. Leslie is a compassionate woman who runs a clinic where she heals people physically as well as offers therapy. Thomas Wayne was married to Martha Wayne and they had a son, Bruce Wayne, who was their only child. At the age of eight, Bruce witnessed his parent’s murder while they walked from a movie theatre through an alley in bad part of town. Traumatized and grief-stricken because they had gone to the theatre for him, he vowed to avenge their deaths by fighting crime until the whole of Gotham city no longer became a utopian where no one would be stolen from or senselessly murdered.
He is gifted with his “powers” because he’d trained his
entire adult life in an attempt to live up to that vow. He is gifted with
incredible speed and agility from honing his skills over time. Built like a
professional wrestler, as dexterous as a gymnast, with the ability to disappear
almost instaneously that any magician or ninja would admire, he is a remarkable
specimen of what any man could become should he seek to surpass all boundaries
of limitations. Not only he is physically impressive, he’s also a brilliant and
deductive person with a remarkably sharp mind. Any man would want to have his
wealth or his body and any woman would want to be in a relationship with a man
who had that wealth and body and especially that brain (okay and there are also
men who would want to date him, too) but he has his foreboding qualities as
well.
He
has never gotten over his parent’s murders. The man whom Bruce Wayne could have
been had perished along with them. As a legitimate detective in the police
force or as a private investigator, he would have had few equals. But he
somehow inherited from the mugger a disregard for the rules. The police had
never discovered the identity of the mugger, so he decided to take the law into
his own hands. He works under the outward restraints, his behaviour is
controlled by his strong moral code to not kill (atleast not directly anyway)
and also the urgency to not allow the public at large to suspect that Bruce
Wayne is actually Batman’s alter ego. As for Bruce Wayne, the face beneath his
Batman mask is ironically a mask of its own. Bruce Wayne is simply the public
face, to women he is the wealthy, kind-hearted, buffoon. A lazy, irresponsible
playboy who had inherited from his parents only their money and not their
decency. He covers this public face, partly in shame, with the “face” of the
Batman, his true personality. The men don’t know if they should be jealous of
luck with women or embarrassed by ineptitude. Bruce is a shallow man, none of
his romances with ordinary women ever gets particularly intimate, never as far
as getting any of them in the sack. It could be that he wishes to be an eternal
bachelor and to never have a child either legitimately or illegitimately. He is
no woman’s husband, no child’s father, forever the son of Thomas & Martha
Wayne. (Batman is Bruce Wayne.)
He is adept at hiding in shadows, prowls in the night, will
come from out of nowhere to single-handedly dispatch nearly a dozen thugs and
knock them unconscious, sparing only one of them whom he interrogates to get
whatever information he wishes to have. And if he has to hang that thug
upside-down from a tall building to get that information, so be it. To
criminals, he is a violent and abusive lunatic or a myth. He doesn’t mind
beating sense into an uncooperative criminal. If they hadn’t wanted him to
attack them, they wouldn’t have committed a crime in his city. When he is
through with them, he’ll leave the criminal tied up or unconscious and allow
the police to arrest him. As a vigilante, he’s wanted by the police and is an
“anti-hero” because he does things that a criminal would do, yet is good
because fights criminals rather than directly breaking a law (i.e. doing
something that willingly causes an innocent person harm).
His relationship with the police is dicey. Commissioner Gordon
is a friend of his, but only because Batman needs the information that Gordon
could provide. He will ask for info while maintaining a respectful distance,
comes and goes unannounced. Gordon appreciates Batman’s cooperation in some
ways, but begrudges him his methods. He outwardly doesn’t seem to know Batman’s
relationship with Bruce Wayne. He knows them as being two separate men.
Although, at times, Bruce does admit to know Batman or have a means of
contacting him, yet Gordon never investigates the connection. Unlike in the
ridiculous TV show, there’s no Hot Line in the Batcave linked to Gordon’s
office that can easily be traced. Mostly, when Gordon wants to speak to Batman,
he’ll shine the Batsignal, or if Batman wants to speak to him, he has the uncanny
ability to find Gordon when’s alone wherever he is. Gordon doesn’t feel most of
the things Batman does are right or ethical, but he appreciates the assistance.
Gotham is a dangerous town despite the fact of the fear its shadier elements
have for the Batman. After all, he’s only one man and they are numberless. Part
of the reason for his liking Gordon is the fact that had Thomas Wayne not been
murdered, he would have been Gordon’s age.
He has allies who do know his secret, though. For many years
he’d known Catwoman was Selina Kyle, but she hadn’t known Batman’s alter ego.
As Bruce, he courted Selina and as Batman he courted Catwoman. He has
associates who aid him in his quest: teenagers and early twenty-somethings who
put on masks like he does yet to them the masks are just masks. Their true
faces are what the masks cover, their true lives are lived out-of-costume. Most
of them could live without being Batman’s cronies. For example, Tim Drake is
(the third) Robin, but Robin isn’t who he really is. Alfred will provide most
of his healing needs and will drive Bruce Wayne around, always being his
conscience. He’s rather close to being a surrogate father, but he is firmly
relegated to the role of butler, an employee. Leslie Thompkins also knows his
secrets and she is firmly against his crusades, but will not leak his identity
to the press. She’s a surrogate mother of sort. While Alfred will quietly keep
his objections mostly with himself and only occasionally poke fun of Bruce’s
peculiar obsessions out of humor, Leslie nags him and forces him to confront
the idea that his parents might not appreciate his efforts and try to get him
to seek closure by giving up his mantle of Batman. And even though Gordon
himself doesn’t know, his daughter, Barbara (aka the 1st Batgirl and then later
“Oracle”), does know his secret. But since Gordon doesn’t know her relationship
with Batman, Batman keeps her sworn to secrecy because having her secret
revealed would be more detrimental to her than his would be.
So……… there’s a lot of complexity.
Superman, another DC hero, is not quite as complex. He is an
alien from some mythical planet known as Krypton. His father was a scientist
who built a rocket ship which sent Superman as a baby to earth where he landed
in rural Kansas. The Clarks found him and adopted the young boy as their own.
So, he has qualities that both adopted kids and immigrants can relate to.
Krypton had blown up… for whatever reason…. And he is one of the last
Kryptonians. Being from another planet, he has the ability to fly, super
strength, etc. etc. (Maybe some immigrants come to America and wish the country
they’d come from would just explode out of existence.) He moves from
Smallville, Kansas, to the big city, Metropolis, because that’s the American
dream, isn’t it? His parents might be dead, but the Clark’s have always loved
him as a son, so he has that family element that Batman lacks. He was
enthralled with Lois Lane, a big city woman so arrogant that she can’t tell
Clark Kent (Superman wearing glasses) from Superman (Superman not wearing
glasses) because she at first feels so completely above the folksy bumpkin for
many years. Who’d think a guy as amazing as Superman could be a milquetoast
like Clark Kent? Oddly, Clark & Lois marry, Lois knows his secret, but in
atleast “Kingdom Come” he’s in a relationship with Wonder Woman & Lois is nowhere to be seen… hm….
Superman is a kind of a joke… he is completely outclassed by
Lois and he just has no idea how Clark Kent can impress her. He believes in
earning his keep, won’t steal or use Superman to gain a profit for himself, so
all he’s got is the money that Clark can earn as a reporter. But Lois has more
energy and ambition than he could ever hope to get. Being an invulnerable
god-like person & a male, Superman
just doesn’t have her ambition. Being a woman, she has to try harder to impress
her superiors. A man would do less work than she does and still get credit
while as a woman, she has to work harder and gets grief for being “too feisty”
for a woman.
Odd Coincidences.
·
DC’s female reporter for a newspaper: Lois Lane, girlfriend
of Superman.
·
Marvel’s female reporter for a newspaper: Betty, a former
girlfriend of Spiderman.
·
DC’s young male photographer for a newspaper: Jimmy Olsen, a
sidekick to Clark Kent who he doesn’t know is Superman.
·
Marvel’s young male photographer for a newspaper: Peter
Parker, who is Spiderman.
·
DC’s loud-mouth, white-haired editor for a newspaper: Perry
White, Clark Kent’s boss.
·
Marvel’s loud-mouth, white-haired editor for a newspaper:
Jonah Jameson, Peter Parker’s boss.
·
DC’s wealthy millionaire: Bruce Wayne, aka the anti-hero
Batman.
·
Marvel’s wealthy millionaire: Norman Osbourne, aka the
villain Green Goblin
·
In the “animated series,” both Green Goblin & Joker were
voiced by Mark Hamill.
·
DC’s bald-headed genius: Lex Luthor, a man who HATES
Superman & all other mutant-like people, or, as he calls them,
“metahumans.” (A teller of lies.)
·
Marvel’s bald-headed genius: Professor Charles Xavier, the
founder of the X-Men and a pro-mutants’ rights advocate. (Tells the truths that
the public at large refuses to believe.)
One reason I might like Batman which I rarely consider important: relating to the chars.
·
The more human/ less dramatic a char is, the more I lose
interest. It’s corny. What I like about Batman is that he uses violence to
subdue criminals. Often times, just walking around in a mall, I would fantasize
about leaping over a guardrail and fall down to the first floor from the
second. Or beating someone up just for the hell of it, but I don’t because I
know for a fact I’d get caught and don’t want to go to jail for assault. So I
really like watching Batman beating-the-crap out of a criminal. Heck, in the
case of The Joker, he seems to be a masochist because he might runaway, but
once Batman catches & starts to beat him up, Joker will just remain
physically submissive while insulting him verbally and egging on the beatings.
He seems to like getting whooped.
·
I also don’t believe Joker’s relationship with Batman is homoerotic.
More likely, he has co-dependency issues in that lives to get Batman’s
attention and will kill innocents just to infuriate opponent’s sense of order.
It’s a measure of non-sexual intimacy. He’ll call Batman “darling” or
“precious” or something endearing to antagonize him; Batman doesn’t like it
when men use such endearing terms to diss him with. Or is it, that he feels
lied to because
if-the-Joker-really-loved-him-then-the-Joker-would-stop-doing-bad-things-to-innoncents?
Either way, Joker doesn’t, in my eyes, wish to have a sexual relationship with
Batman. He likes things as they are. And, hey, he’s a criminal. If he were gay,
I feel he’d rather have intercourse with other criminals who are as equally
deranged as he is. I’ve had more bad days than good in my life, generally feel
being miserable is my customary mood, so I wish I could just SNAP and stop
caring about the consequences.
·
There’s some really amusing moments in The Dark Returns
concerning a young boy’s reactions to Joker and Batman. Joker runs into a House
of Mirrors, Batman hot on his heels. As he’s looking over his shoulder, a boy
calls out “You’re the Joker, right? Batman’s gonna kick your ass.” Joker grabs
the kid and shoves a gun in his face to reward him for the insult. Batman crashes
through the glass and is gut-shot by Joker who throws the boy down, no longer
needing the hostage. Joker runs off as the boy shouts “Batman --- he’s getting
away --- get up. You got to kick his ---“ Wounded from just being shot, just
barely conscious, he tells the kid “watch your language, son.” The kid answers
“yes, sir.” It’s amusing in that Joker had exploited Batman’s irrepressible
desire to be a hero by using the kid. Batman had just saved the kid’s life and
instead of being thanked, the kid is disappointed that he hadn’t kicked Joker’s
ass for the kid… it’s a matter of honor that his hero go kick the bad guy’s ass
because he’d told the bad guy he was going to get his ass kicked. This is all
he can think of. To his credit, Batman doesn’t lose his temper. He doesn’t hit
the kid and tell him to shut-the-hell-up. He just firmly admonishes him to not
swear. The chain of events is just so absurd. Even after being shot, he can’t
help but try to be the fatherly role-model type.
What I don’t like in comics (or tv shows or movies): formulaic thinking and/or attempts to market products or beliefs.
·
I HATE that Trojan Man gimmick used to sell condoms or that
other thing for the Sloman Shield commercials… or Arm & Hammer. Spiderman
would try to help a friend who had a drug addiction to try and teach the reader
that doing drugs is bad or he’d help clear wreckage at ground zero of the WTC
attacks, or he’d try to teach a young boy it was wrong to believe using a gun
made him a tough person. I don’t expect to see myself in a story, or I tend to
relate to the dorkiest char there is in the story (example, Otacon in the Metal
Gear Solid series of videogames) and not the hero.
·
I also don’t like how in the early years of Marvel, every
one of the major chars seemed to derive their super-powers from nuclear
accidents. Another odd thing is how they’d have supposedly “intelligent”
scientist-type chars who are meglomaniacal twits who don’t really speak very
intelligently. (Doctor Octopus constantly ranted about how wonderful he’s
“artificial arms” were.) Ras Al Ghul & Bane, for instance, are as equally
eloquent & fit as Batman is. (Bane is basically the ultimate steroid
fanatic yet he also says things which are clever.) Al Ghul will utilize both a
sharp sword AND his sharp wit when fencing with Batman. Joker’s banter in “The
Killing Joke,” especially when he claims that Barbara Gordon suddenly became
fixated with the delusion that she had become a coffee-table book was
incredibly funny, despite the fact he’d just shot & paralyzed her and she
was bleeding out as he was speaking; the violence wasn’t funny, but how he
described what he’d done was. Spiderman, on the other hand, will say “EXCUSE
ME!” or “whoops” or something ridiculous like that to get cheap jokes at his
opponent’s expense. Not very funny. They also have the stereotypical concept
that really strong chars must be very dumb as well: Rhino. (All the major chars in Superman seem to be
aliens like he is; if not from other planets, from other dimensions.)
· I also don’t like Spiderman’s mask because it hides his lips. Batman’s mask is designed to show only the lower portion of his face. It proves his humanity to a degree, draws attention to this small portion of exposed flesh so people’s eyes might be drawn towards his chin. He’s very good at showing his mood by frowning to intimidate people. Joker has an obsession with getting Batman to smile or to laugh at his jokes. He’ll also show his teeth when he talks. You don’t get this from information from Spiderman. And, I preferred the comic book’s Green Goblin because he looked almost human, just he had green skin and pointy ears. If you could remember whose face might look like that yet add the green pigment to that, you might be able to deduce who he was. It’s taunting that he wears a hood to cover up his hair. So, seeing that his human qualities made the rest of his appearance and behaviour unsettling. But his wearing a mask (as he did in the movie) so you couldn’t see his lips move was an annoying hindrance. He looked like he was simply a robot.
· Another convention I dislike is when the events of the story all revolve around a holiday. I don’t care what Easter or Christmas or Halloween looks like in Bikini Bottom. It’s been DONE four thousand times, we all know what the frickin’ holidays are, so write about something else. (An exception to this is “The Long Halloween” and “Dark Victory” where murders are conducted throughout the year and as bodies of police men or gangsters pile up, the reader becomes anxious to figure out who is committing the murders and, more importantly, who will survive the carnage.) So love-affirming sappy nonsense is bad, but bloodshed is good…
· I don’t like topical references used to make something sound cool. Chars arbitrarily name-dropping popular movies (Titanic) or TV shows (Friends) or sports teams just to make the title sound hip and yet the mentioning of those things really have nothing to add to the plot.
The “Marvel Method” basically refers to a technique that Marvel uses to produce their products.
1.)
The writer will make up a synopsis for what he wanted the
artist to draw.
2.)
The artist draws the page.
3.)
The writer will look at what the artist drew and tailor his
words to fit the drawings.
This process puts a strong emphasis upon the art rather than
the words. I’m sure it works some people, but I personally don’t like it. I’m a
word-person, not a picture-person. A comic could have the most vibrant looking
pictures, but if the writing is faulty, I will walk away saying “the writing is
faulty” and disliking it. I much rather prefer the approach where the writing
is done first as a script before the artist does his job. In this way, both
elements work beautifully in tamdem; a juggler who begins to juggle two balls
and can only keep one ball aloft while dropping the other isn’t a good
juggler.
Examples of good writing…
Batman: Gotham Knights, issue 50, “Pushback, book one” by A.J. Lieberman. The
story opens with the words “We strive to be what we are not.” / “It’s not
merely that we fail to live up to our best ideas.” / “It’s the fact that our
best ideas ---“ / “---what we can accomplish ---“/ “--- are for most, ideas
that tend to be the opposite of our natural abilities.” / “All of which makes
the person who knows himself ---“ / “---who knows his limits ---“ / “--- his
frailties ---“ / “--- his weaknesses ---“ / “--- all the more dangerous.” These words are transposed over the
horrifying sight of Edward “The Riddler” Nygma crashing through the skylight of
a fancy party for rich socialites. The people stand over his body, revealing
modest curiosity about the man who’d fallen into their midst, but don’t seem to
be offering him any first aid. If anything, they probably are feeling
discomforted that his apparent suicide had interrupted their amusement and he’d
broken the glass of the skylight. It’s
not entirely clear who the narrator or speaker is refering to as being the
“dangerous” humble people. Obviously, Nygma is meant to set an example for the
rich snobs. Standing above, draped in shadow, is a figure who at first appears
to be Batman. We don’t find out until the next issue who it is. The
consideration that Nygma had jumped is cancelled out by the appearance of the
person who’d pushed him, but we aren’t sure of the pusher’s identity. Okay,
perhaps philosophical ramblings aren’t your thing?
Perhaps. Later on, there are three men in a boat, all of
which have shotguns. They seem to be discussing what they each feel to be the
worst way to die. The first man says, “A lack of attention.” The second man
says, “What?” First man says, “I think I’m gonna die from, like, a lack of
attention.” He can’t seem to think of an example. The second man is skeptical,
“what the --- how in the freakin’ “H” do ya think that’s gonna
happen?” The third offers falling in a manhole. Meaning he couldn’t be paying
attention and next thing he knows he walks right into an open manhole. The
second man doesn’t get it. He demands, “like a real manhole in the street?” The
third man says, “other than your mouth, you know any other kind?” Haha! They second man doesn’t comment on the
implied gay accusation and presses “are you livin’ in a cartoon movie or
somethin’? Who falls into a manhole?” The second man amends that he just
doesn’t want to die a humorous death that would cause others to laugh at him
when he’s gone. The clincher comes when the third man says, “I don’t wanna get
stuck in a waste pipe like that guy in the movie where he’s busting’ outta
prison.” Ofcourse he’s talking about THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION. The fun part is
being able to deduce the movie reference without being told the exact title.
Another good example is Marvel’s The Incredible Hulk
Vol. 2, Issues 1-4, “Boiling Point” by Bruce Jones (part of their Digital Comic
Book Series) where Bruce Banner, a police negotiator, and a man who holds
people in a convience store hostage all meet up in a chance encounter with
tense circumstances. The whole story has a flow… beautifully done.
An example of bad writing is Ultimate X-Men, Volume
3: Issues 1 – 6 by Mike Millar & Chuck Chuckausten. The story is muddied
with too much snappy dialouge, the plot is fairly preposterous… “The X-Men
embark on a their first-ever field trip trying to follow Professor Xavier’s
dream to spread peace.” Field trip!?!?!?! Argh! It’s mostly drivel, random
one-liners thrown in here & there, dumber than a sock. The only good part
comes at the end, though. Professor Xavier’s comments are pretty interesting.
He starts out having faith in what he is attempting to accomplish. We see that
Magneto has been subdued with a mental block from Xavier and is taking care of
Down’s Syndrome children. Things go awry, and horribly wrong. Xavier feels he
has failed and considers terminating the whole thing. Magneto, however consoles
him and reveals that he’d bought a ticket to Xavier’s lecture of his own will.
Due to the block he doesn’t remember his past and thinks he’s just ordinary
Erick Leshner, teacher of disadvantaged children and he also doesn’t reckognize
Professor Xavier, but he was enough in agreement with Xavier’s cause to wish to
listen to the man speak. Xavier weeps at this evidence of his nemsis’
rehabilitation. Several times he and two other telepaths commented how it was
nearly impossible to surprise a telepath and yet he’d been so caught up in his
own feelings of regret that Erick Leshner had bought the ticket without his
being aware of it. He realizes that even though events hadn’t gone according to
his plans, he had actually been doing the right thing the whole time by allowing
the various X-Men members to have a cause larger than themselves to believe
in. It is best to accept it when things
go wrong and try to look on the bright side rather than fixate on how terrible
it is something had gone wrong.